GayGeek

Does Young Hot Latinos deliver what it promises on the outside?

The name of the site pretty much sums up what you will find inside. The content is dedicated to Latino guys, and there is a large amount of content inside. Many of them are hot, but I did find a number of them that I didn't feel would qualify for that title. There are some twinks, and muscular guys here, but there are also some guys who I would call "thick". Not fat, but not thin and toned either. So take the "hot" part with a grain of salt.

What's good about Young Hot Latinos? What needs improvement?

The site says that it has been cleaned up a bit to make the presentation better. It is still a bit too busy for my tastes. There are ads all down the side of the page that can get a bit distracting at times.

The content is updated twice a week, and there is a calendar where you can see what is coming for the next month. Each update has a photo gallery, streaming video, and video downloads in 2 formats. (WMP and iPod) The photos are good quality, and can be downloaded easily. The videos are decent quality, but not great. The lighting in most of them I saw was either too high, or too low. I also found the guys to be hit or miss on their attractiveness.

The downloaded videos played quite well, and did not take too long to download. I was never able to get the streaming video to work, but I was having internet issues this week, so it was probably my issue, and not the site's. I won't hold that against them. There is also no DRM that I could see which makes me a happy camper!

There are tons of bonus sites, and bonus videos offered on the site. These are for various sister sites with different themes. Some of the content I have seen elsewhere on the internet and on DVD's. I'm not sure if this content was published by this site originally, or of they have licensed it to be shown here. But, be prepared that you might see familiar sights.

How is Young Hot Latinos unique?

The site claims that the content is exclusive, but I have seen some of it before. Whether it started here or not, I couldn't guess.