GayGeek

Does Young Hunks deliver what it promises on the outside?

Younghunks.com was voted ‘best teen male site of the year’ by Playgirl magazine, it does not state what year it won and if indeed this was the best site, I would hate to see worst site. Another bold claim is Topgaysite of 2001 so in the spirit of things I am going to make up an award ‘worst pay site of 2008’ this site does promise a lot of things from its extremely small preview area but magnificently fails to deliver anything.

What's good about Young Hunks? What needs improvement?

I can absolutely say there is nothing at all good about this site, all their material seems to be recycled bad quality porn circa 2000. The photosets are of an acceptable quality but are very dated and I have no doubt that many people would have seen these models before. The video selection is small and offered in clips, the quality is awful and they are unwatchable in full screen mode. The models are far from young, I would say most are mid to late twenties, twink lovers will be very disappointed. The site design is also as dated as the porn. I have spent less than half an hour viewing this site and that was time wasted.

How is Young Hunks unique?

This site has been put together with little thought and respect for the customers, this site has one aim, to generate as much cash as possible without giving anything in return, which of course is not unique on the web.

What do paying users recieve for their money?

Younghunks.com has a recurring membership of $29.95 a month and in my opinion, they are charging $29.95 too much. The material this site offers is absolute crap and should be avoided, the site owners also should be ashamed of themselves

Rating:
Ease of use:
Download speed:
Erotic content:
Technical quality of content:
Visual quality of site:
Level of advertising:
Amount of content:

Other GayGeek reviews of Young Hunks