GayGeek

Does William Higgins deliver what it promises on the outside?

Since joining GayGeek as a reviewer, now over two years, I've seen a lot of gay porn sites. Some have just been outstanding--lots of content, cute boys, hot action, great photography and videos, and lots of care in the presentation of not only the models and actors in the porn, but the website construction and business management as well.

Others have not attained such glory. I feel William Higgins is one of these.

What's good about William Higgins? What needs improvement?

There's not a lot I liked. My major complaints:

1. You have to provide credit card, email and other information twice--once to sign up and then as an added security feature the first time you visit, you have to provide selected information again. That's not necessary and was annoying.

2. Selection is poor. While they have lots of categories--fetish, bi-sex, etc.--when I visited the various video and photo sets most were "archived." What the fuck? I'm paying to see photos--why aren't they up and available?

3. The answer to my question at the end of Item #2 above is... because William Higgins CHARGES you for Zip downloads of archived files. This is sheer insanity--you basically pay twice for the porn as a result. Your initial membership provides you with a certain number of ZIP credits, after which you apparently need to buy more. Screw that!

How is William Higgins unique?

While some of the models and actors on this porn site are hot, the convoluted means to get access to the photos and video, combined with the detrimental points I noted earlier, makes this site unique--in that it's the worst site I think I've come across as far as being user-friendly and reasonable for its cost.