Does Mike Hancock deliver what it promises on the outside?
This is an amateur site with some extremely hot models, some twinks and some a little older. A lot are straight, some are bisexual and some are gay but all know how to give it all in a photo shoot. The site primarily features videos but there are large photo galleries with photos from these videos. I feel the site delivers what it promises.
What's good about Mike Hancock? What needs improvement?
There are 72 models and 192 videos and the site is updated every Friday. Click on a model and you will see a good bio of him as well as his video appearances. I saw several noted porn stars in the group of models and, considering the video appearances of many of the models, I am led to question the "amateur" standing of the site. Regardless, amateur or pro, these guys know how to "put on a show" and it shows in the video offerings. Some are solos but most show duo action and it is hot. The extensive photo galleries of shots from these videos is almost as good as the videos themselves.
How is Mike Hancock unique?
The site really is not all that unique but it does offer some pairings of some very hot models in some very hot action. The sex is a lot better here than in a lot of sites. Of course, each photo can be clicked to enlarge and download. The models that insist they are 100% straight really do know how to perform with a partner. Do you think they are being told what to do or are they just going all out and having fun. You decide!!
What do paying users recieve for their money?
The member get a very large collection of videos and photo galleries from each one. Other sites that have such videos might have a few photos from them but never such a large gallery. It seems the entire video is actually shown in photo excerpts.
| Rating: | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Ease of use: | ![]() |
| Download speed: | ![]() |
| Erotic content: | ![]() |
| Technical quality of content: | ![]() |
| Visual quality of site: | ![]() |
| Level of advertising: | ![]() |
| Amount of content: | ![]() |
Other GayGeek reviews of Mike Hancock
Jerkoff Genius's review 
May 26, 2008
MikeHancock.com was previously known as HancockHotel.com or Straightmen.com. This site dates back to around 2003 or earlier - so there is a sizeable build-up of content here. Read full review
NewsBoy's review 
May 19, 2008
The claims on the outside don't go very far, making just one promise: amateur men. And that's pretty much what you get (although a few of the guys have appeared on so many sites they've made a profession out of being amateur). Read full review
Techie's review 
May 6, 2008
Hancock's amateur series contains photo sets and videos of mostly twenty something straight men jacking and having gay sex. No skinny twinks here. Mike participates on camera servicing some of the guys in some of the scenes. The photography and settings are clean and simple. Read full review







