GayGeek

Does Lollipop Twinks deliver what it promises on the outside?

Lollipop twinks promises unspoiled twinks as sweet as lollipops that can go all night. I am paraphrasing, but that's their promise in a nutshell.

The website delivers in that the boys are cute and look young. However, it doesn't deliver on the believability that these boys are fresh and are exploring their sexuality. The scenes are scripted (quite obviously), the sex is mechanical and the video editing isn't great.

As well, I don't understand the whole lollipop thing. Is the lollipop a phallus? If so, why do need one when there is dick in the room. If it is an effort make these boys appear young, it is unnecessary- they look very young and pretty.

What's good about Lollipop Twinks? What needs improvement?

Good:
- Navigation is easy
- There is access to other content from other sites (same format of site, so probably the same company) that includes twinks sans lollipop
- photo and video visual quality are good
- you can navigate by model and model, and request more information about each model

Needs Improvement:
- model performances (these boys are supposed to be at their sexual peak but their performances don't display that)
- news hasn't been updated since Sept. 2009
- Layout is very basic
- Lollipops are good for solos (phallus), they are unnecessary in couple and three way scenes (either that or use them better - it's almost as if someone said here have lollipop, it gets in the way as opposed to enhancing the scene)

How is Lollipop Twinks unique?

I think it's trying to be unique with the whole lollipop thing. Unfortunately, it doesn't take it far enough or use the lollipops to enhance the scene. Again, it as if someone said how can we be different form other twink sites? and someone I know we'll give the boys lollipops. Instead of trying to stand out with quality, this company chose a gimmick.