Does Boy Funk deliver what it promises on the outside?
This site says "All photography is done exclusively for the members of BoyFunk." Maybe so, if you read the promo carefully, but at least several of the twinks here have been seen elsewhere. The models have the Brad Posey look but don't all rise to that level of deliciousness.
What's good about Boy Funk? What needs improvement?
It's a relatively easy site to navigate, as the content is not extensive. But given the straightforward organization of the content, there's no reason to have frames or - horrors! - frames within frames in order to get to the pictures. The photography itself is just adequate, never exceptionally inspired.
How is Boy Funk unique?
There's an attempt at getting a biographical interview of some of the models. Mostly, the models fill out a questionnaire of typical, shallow questions. Frankly, if I was given a chance to ask questions of some 18-year-old beauty who's flogging his meat for the world to see, I wouldn't want to know what his favorite color is. The streaming video chit chat is a little more revealing. "Tommy" at first says he's got brothers and sisters, all older, then waves his hand and says he doesn't want to talk about family. The unseen interviewer immediately re-asks the question and Sean says he's an only child. And there you have it, without the miracle of modern film editing.
What do paying users recieve for their money?
About 40 boys' galleries. Most of those also have a few streaming video clips of their photo-shoots. A couple of guy-on-guy galleries and clips, but mostly the material consists of solos. Some web cams through another server and a VHS video store. That's about it.
| Rating: |  |
|---|---|
| Ease of use: |  |
| Download speed: |  |
| Erotic content: | |
| Technical quality of content: |  |
| Visual quality of site: | |
| Level of advertising: | |
| Amount of content: |  |
Other GayGeek reviews of Boy Funk
Mackenzie's review 
September 26, 2008
Photos and videos of some great, beautiful young men. These are not "boys" - they are, of course, twinks, but very handsome young guys who obviously enjoy performing before the camera. Yes, the site delivers. Read full review
Jerkoff Genius's review 
September 12, 2008
BoyFunk is a well-known California twinkie site that has been around since around 2002. You might think that after more than 5 years of operation that there would be more content here than there is. Take a look yourself at the 70+ featured models on the tour - this is what you will get for your membership as well. All models on the tour generally have both a photoset and video (WMP) offering (but not always). Read full review
TLBear's review 
August 3, 2004
"100% Beautiful Teen Boys." Well I don't know if it really delivers or not. Teen Boys just aren't my thing. I can say that there are a lot of them including at least one set of alleged brothers. A few of the boys were masculine enough for me to find them attractive, so there is the quandry. Since there are a few that I find attractive, them I would have to assume that a hard-core twink lover probably wouldn't find them attractive, so I think the goal of 100% beautiful might be a little unrealistic as beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :-) Read full review
Becoming X's review
July 20, 2004
"For pennies a day" Boy Funk promises original content of the hottest twinks on the Internet. For the most part they deliver the goods. Read full review
Just Mikal's review 
July 8, 2004
This is a very interesting site. They promise 100% beautiful teen boys and deliver for the most part. I had previously seen the thumbnails pics of all the guys and was quite impressed. And to be sure, many many of the guys are very beautiful. But there are some average lookers (IMHO) in the bunch that maybe aren't as noticeable. Please make no mistake, however, the majority of guys are definitely worth it. Boyfunk states that all the guys are personally photographed by their own photographers. Read full review
