GayGeek

Does Blue Boys deliver what it promises on the outside?

Like most sites, BlueBoy.org has a nice splash entry page, enticing preview pages, and a membership rate comparable to most other gay porn sites. But it's all smoke and mirrors.

What's good about Blue Boys? What needs improvement?

The content varies widely in quantity and quality. Some photo sets are small, and don't even show a money-shot photo, while other sets are in large resolution, clear and professionally done. Video by-and-large is grainy, low res, and not worth the time. I was frankly very disappointed by this site, and found a number of links in it that just didn't work.

Some of the models are unique to the site, hired by them for photos and video, but the majority of the site is composed of other site's work, much of it in reduced size and quality.

The whole site needs major improvement, completely original content, and high quality video if it expects to stand up even among just mediocre sites on the web.

How is Blue Boys unique?

The site does offer some "original boys" content--models that only it supposedly features. Aside from that, the content is from other sites, used with permission or otherwise (I'm not sure)... overall, quality is poor and I just didn't find much here that interested me or was excitingly new.

There are no zip files for easy photo set downloads, a feature that many other high-end sites readily adopted. The navigation for the site is relatively easy however.

What do paying users recieve for their money?

You'll get retread content, photo sets that are mediocre, poor video quality, not a lot of great content, and some original models that have been photographed and videographed to varying degrees of professionalism and quality. All-in-all, it's not worth it.

Rating:
Ease of use:
Download speed:
Erotic content:
Technical quality of content:
Visual quality of site:
Level of advertising:
Amount of content:

Other GayGeek reviews of Blue Boys