GayGeek

Does Bare Twinks deliver what it promises on the outside?

BareTwinks is a bareback spin-off of BoyCrush. It's an all fucking amateur site. There are no solos and no mutual masturbation that doesn't end without penetration as the finale. The preview offers a video clip of all of the content along with plenty of screen shots.

BareTwinks has a clear understanding and appreciation for the definition of a twink. Slender, hairless and a barely legal appearance are the essential ingredients and Webmaster Brian has a solid handle on the genre. The boys are a nice mix of next door types with some Emo homos added for some spice.

Brian's style is to have his models self-select partners and then video what comes naturally. He doesn't provide much direction. These boys are really into each other resulting in a great deal of passion on screen. No one looks bored or appears to be just going through the motions.

The newest updates are wide screen high-def. Resolution for the older content is also very high – near DVD quality.

What's good about Bare Twinks? What needs improvement?

With a few exceptions, there are no narratives to the scenes. The boys simply get busy on a studio set bed with little or no conversation. Brian and another associate handle the cameras and do a good job of showing us what we want to see. Lighting and sound are adequate.

One small point – BoyCrush has introductory interview videos that help us get to know the models. I've criticized Brian for his lack of creativity in BoyCrush interviews. His questions are from a routine check list and he has tendency to not carefully listen to a model's answer (there is never a follow-up question to an interesting answer). That criticism aside, I missed the absence of interviews on Bare Twinks. I think Brian assumes that we've already gotten to know these models. They have all appeared on BoyCrush before making it to BareTwinks. Even if I have been a BoyCrush subscriber, I would enjoy hearing from the boys again. What are their lives like now that they have been in front of the camera for awhile?

There is additional bonus content mislabeled as video feeds. The content is actually video updates from 4 other sites that seem random without any unifying theme. The sites don't exclusively feature twinks and the videos are not exclusively bareback.

[GayGeek note: Techie does not consider these to be true video feeds, but three of the four sets of bonus content meet GayGeek's criteria. Techie is correct that all four sets of bonus content are based on existing websites, a common practice for content feeds. None of the four exclusively focus on twinks, and only one of the four is exclusively bareback.]

How is Bare Twinks unique?

All of the original content is performed without the use of condoms.