Does Amateur Straight Boy Videos deliver what it promises on the outside?
The site promises action videos of straight-appearing, straight-in-reality young gentlemen who, having fallen into need of some cash, have decided to earn a bit of money by appearing in porn video largely directed at a gay audience (though there appears to be a growing audience of straight women who enjoy boy-boy videos, and who can blame them?). It delivers some content, but the technical quality and delivery leave much to be desired.
What's good about Amateur Straight Boy Videos? What needs improvement?
Hot guys, but the site's pages are overbloated with too may thunbnail pictures that load way too slowly. On a high speed cable connection, I couldn't get an average page to load in less than 7 minutes. At that rate, if you want to j/o while enjoying the delights of this site, you'd better go for Cialis rather than Viagra.
How is Amateur Straight Boy Videos unique?
It's the first site I've seen in years that has the technical quality of old 8mm porn loops that you used to see in peep shows, only with a bit of sound track added. The motion is herky-jerky; the quality is grainy, and although you can see that SOMETHING is happening, you couldn't testify in a court of law as to whether or what specific sexual act was being performed. To a generation that's grown up on the clinical closeups showing dilation of capillaries during erection, that's a bit of a surprise.
What do paying users recieve for their money?
Dim, slow glimpses of attractive college-age porn models posed as straight boys.
| Rating: | ![]() |
|---|---|
| Ease of use: | ![]() |
| Download speed: | ![]() |
| Erotic content: | ![]() |
| Technical quality of content: | ![]() |
| Visual quality of site: | ![]() |
| Level of advertising: | ![]() |
| Amount of content: | ![]() |
Other GayGeek reviews of Amateur Straight Boy Videos
NewsBoy's review 
November 23, 2004
Pictures and videos of straight boys who're "doing it for the cash". Read full review







